In a history class, you will read two main types of materials: primary sources and secondary sources. Primary sources
form the “raw data” of history, and include things like government
documents, speeches, memoirs, diary entries, newspaper and magazine
articles, and eyewitness accounts of events. Most of the primary
sources we will be looking at were created at the time of the event
being described, and they provide historians with a window into the
past. Secondary sources are books and articles
written by historians based on the primary sources, and incorporate
their own arguments and interpretations of the events.
Each chapter in your Major Problems in American History Since 1945
book includes both primary and secondary sources. The primary sources
are at the beginning of the chapter, in the section titled “Documents,”
while the secondary sources follow in the “Essays” section. You should
not approach these two types of readings in the same way, nor should
you read them the same way you might read a textbook, where your goal
is to read for information. Here are some pointers for reading these
types of sources:
Reading the Documents in Major Problems
There
are a number of things you need to think about to use primary sources
effectively. Each of these points has a space on the accompanying chart
for you to fill in as you work through the documents.
- What type of source is this?
Historians use lots of different sources, and you need to understand
what type of source you are looking at to get the most out of it. You
should note the kind of source you are looking at. Some examples of
documents you will see in Major Problems: diary entries,
secret government reports, memoirs, political speeches, transcripts of
conversations, newspaper and magazine articles, police reports, and
charts and graphs. These sources have very different audiences and
purposes, which will be discussed below.
- Who is the author and why is this person historically significant? Many of the documents in Major Problems
are written by well-known historical figures, while others are written
by people you may not have heard of before. You should note not only
the name of the author, but also some identifying information. This
will help you to assess the point of view of the author. For example,
Chapter 2 contains a report written by the Soviet Ambassador to the
United States, Nikolai Novikov, on US policy in the early Cold War. Why
is it important to keep in mind his official position? The fact that he
is a Soviet diplomat provides a useful balance to the American
documents in the chapter, and is a signal to you as a reader that his
perspective is going to be different from that of the American
officials. That same chapter includes a speech by Senator Joseph
McCarthy. You will learn in class that McCarthy is known for his drive
to root all communist influence out of American government in the early
1950s. You should keep this in mind as you read the document, as it
tells you something about McCarthy’s perspective as an author.
- When is the document written? Knowing
the date of the document will help you to place it in the chronology of
the course. However, when you think about the date, go beyond noting
simply the month and year. Where does this document fit into the larger
chronological scope of the class? For example, if you look at a
document on the Vietnam War, think about how the date of production
fits into what you know about how the war changed over time: was it
produced at the beginning of the conflict or near the end? This will
help you to place each individual document into its larger historical
context.
**To find the answers to the questions above, be sure to check the brief introduction to each document section in Major Problems,
as this will identify the documents included and often discuss their
larger significance. At the bottom of the first page of each document
is a citation for the source of the document, which can provide useful
information.**
These
first three questions ask you to look for basic factual information
about the document, the “who, what, where and when.” The next group of
questions ask you to go a step farther, to think about the “hows and
whys” of history. This will require you to think more deeply about the
sources, the message of the authors, and how these documents fit into
the larger themes of the course. This is where the interesting work
begins!
- Who is the author’s intended audience and what is the author’s purpose for writing?
These two questions are closely related, and to answer them you need to
have thought about the questions above. Many of the documents you will
read were written to persuade someone to do something: perhaps to
convince the president to support a particular policy, to encourage the
American people to vote for a particular candidate, or to win the
public’s support for a movement for reform, such as civil rights. Once
you understand who the target audience is, think about why the author
chooses to address them. What does the author hope to convince them to
do?
- What are the key points of the author’s argument?
This is where you should begin to evaluate the body of the document.
How does the author structure the argument? What does the author use as
supporting evidence? You will find, for example, that in the
presidential speeches historical references are often used to make a
point. Think about how the speechwriter uses these references to reach
the American people with a specific message.
- What is the value of this document to you as a student of history?
This is the “what’s the point” question, or, at its most fundamental
level, why is your professor making you read this particular document?
Why is it so important? Think about how this document sheds light on a
particular event you have discussed in class or a course theme. Many of
these documents, when read together, give conflicting opinions about
events. How does this help us to develop a more complex view of
historical events and debates?
Some
of the documents you are assigned for class will be discussed in more
depth than others, and it may not be possible to write a long answer to
each of the above questions for every document. But if you keep these
six points in mind, along with the specific details that your
individual professor asks you to focus on, you should have a good grasp
of the primary documents you need to read for History 199.
Reading the Essays in Major Problems
The essays in Major Problems
are secondary sources written by historians, often using some of the
documents included in the document section of each chapter. Reading
critical essays requires a different technique than that used to read a
textbook. While you read a textbook for content and information, when
you read these critical essays you should read for the argument. What
point is the author trying to make, and how does the historian use
evidence to support that point? Many of these essays discuss in more
depth a particularly important historical episode and try to encourage
the reader to think about these events from a different perspective.
Keep in mind that when read together, the essays in a chapter often
present contrasting viewpoints.
Most of the essays in Major Problems
are written at a high academic level, which means there will probably
be words and concepts that you are not familiar with. Please don’t let
this keep you from reading the essay: make a note of the sections you
don’t understand, or the words you are unfamiliar with, and bring them
up in class or see your professor in office hours. Chances are, if you
don’t understand them there will be other students in your class in the
same situation! One of the most valuable skills you have the
opportunity to develop in college is the ability to read and comprehend
at a high level, but you can’t develop this skill if you don’t try to
work through difficult texts. This is where you, as a student, can take
the initiative to get the most out of your classes.
Hint: Each chapter of Major Problems
begins with a short introduction in italics, and each set of essays has
a short introductory paragraph that places the essays in the context of
larger historical debates. Be sure to read these sections before
reading the essays!
Questions to ask for critical essays:
- What is the author’s main argument? This
is usually given in the first few paragraphs of the article. If you
have trouble finding it there, be sure to look at the conclusion. Once
you understand the point the author is trying to make, it will be
easier to determine what parts of the essay are most important.
- What supporting evidence does the author provide for their argument?
How does the author make the case for their argument? Are there
specific historical examples that are used? Does the author respond to
opposing arguments and perspectives?
- Do you buy the author’s argument? After
reading the author’s argument and evidence, think about where you stand
on the issue. This question is a good way to think about how you might
discuss a particular essay in class.
- How does this essay fit into class discussions and course themes? Does it provide a different interpretation from that in your textbook or class lectures?
By Stefanie Wichhart, Assistant Professor of History, Niagara University