 |
Artists & Works
|
|
Jedd Garet
American (b. 1955)
CURTAIN OF PROTECTION (1980)
acrylic on canvas
73" x 57" |
 |
| STYLE:
Neo-expressionism |
|
|
The raw, discordant colors and mysterious symbolism of Curtain
of Protection evoke an eerie disquiet on the part of the viewer.
Something is wrong in this picture, but what is it? The dark central
figure, twisting and turning in a waterfall of garish red acrylic,
seems threatened, but by whom? Why is protection necessary? The
ominous questions and moods that Garet's paintings raise are typical
of many works from the Neo-Expressionist movement, a style which
germinated in the 70s and came to full flower in the 80s. Neo-Expressionism
is marked by a concern with gesture, color, and apocalyptic subject
matter, inasmuch as such generalities can describe a very diverse
era in painting. Garet, like many other young painters of his generation,
is looking to the physical qualities of paint to transform emotional
statements into color and movement. Unlike the Abstract Expressionists
of the mid-20th century, he doesn't mind using recognizable figures
to do so. The implied violence of Curtain of Protection is
the most perplexing aspect of the painting. Is the figure in danger?
Or is it all a witty pretense?
|
CRITICAL EXCERPTS
|
|
Maurice Poirier, ARTnews, 4/86
"His appropriation of modes and motifs from de Chirico especially,
together with the glaring mannerist quality of his color, is still
in evidence...Garet's greatest talent may well lie in landscape
and seascape, and few artists know how to exploit the raw radiance
latent in acrylic with as much poetic flair."
|
John Zinnser, Art
in America, 9/89
"Jedd Garet...is an artist for whom subtlety has never been the issue...His
earliest works were rendered in macho swirls of acrylic impasto. For
all their reckless speed and abandon, the paintings managed to look
like instant masterpiecesclassicism with a raffish downtown spirit.
In them, Garet borrowed freely from Giorgio de Chirico, especially
his images of a psychologically charged landscape inhabited by solitary,
mannequinlike figures." |
Nancy Grimes, ARTnews,
12/87
"During the early 80s Jedd Garet brought into the mainstream a style
or school of art that looked purposely inept. 'Bad' artists favored
awkward, childish drawing, off-balance composition, discordant color,
and slapdash paint application. Neo-Expressionism represented the
Golden Age of Bad. In this selection of recent paintings, Garet brings
badness to biomorphic abstraction, proving that he is one of the best
bad artists around. By denying expectations of balance, unity, and
harmony, Garet unerringly achieves a disquieting offnessam eerie
sense that the natural, automatic processes of psyche and soma celebrated
by Surrealism and Abstract Expressionism have gone awry...Garet's
incredibly studied paintings burlesque the notions of spontaneity
and naturalness that have generated so much modern abstraction. Without
completely discarding the category of the natural, he suggests that
the nature of nature has yet to be determined." |
|
Donald Kuspit, ARTFORUM, 11/87
"Garet works in a mode that might be called surreal-baroque abstract,
with a touch of rococo potential...What garet gives us is a baroque
sense of imperfect visionary flight on a surrealist basea sense
of incongruous forms mysteriously converging, inhabiting the same
pictorial space for no apparent reason...his paintings are full
of pathos tending to violence, distilled into a witty, but nonetheless
extreme pictorial gesture...The final effect in ornamental in the
best sense:...a playful network of light and shade, conveying a
sense of emotional peculiarity and sinuousness."
|
|
|